Market Overview:
The global remote fertigation monitoring service market is expected to grow at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period from 2018 to 2030. The market growth can be attributed to the increasing demand for precision agriculture and the rising awareness about the benefits of remote fertigation monitoring services. The global remote fertigation monitoring service market can be segmented on the basis of type into monitoring services with testing and monitoring services without testing. Monitoring services with testing are further sub-segmented into soil moisture, pH level, electrical conductivity (EC), and others. On the basis of application, the global remote fertigation monitoring service market can be segmented into agro-industrial companies, agricultural institutes, and others. Geographically, North America is expected to dominate the global remote fertigation monitoring service market duringthe forecast period owing to technological advancements in this region coupled with rising awareness about precision agriculture practices among farmers.
Product Definition:
Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service is a service that helps farmers to monitor the health of their crops using sensors and cameras. This service allows farmers to detect problems early, so they can take corrective action before the problem becomes too serious.
Monitoring Services with Testing:
The global remote fertigation monitoring service market size was valued at USD 5.0 billion in 2016 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of XX% over the forecast period. The rising number of initiatives undertaken by various governments across the globe for creating awareness among farmers regarding advanced agricultural practices is one of the key factors contributing to market growth globally.
In addition, increasing demand for high-quality crops with enhanced shelf life.
Monitoring Services without Testing:
The global monitoring services without testing market size was valued at USD 1.5 billion in 2015 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of XX% over the forecast period. The key drivers for this market are increasing demand for remote fertigation monitoring service, rising awareness about greenhouse gas emission, and need to reduce cost of fertilizers by using less quantity or no chemicals at all during its production process.
Application Insights:
The market is segmented based on application into agro-industrial companies, agricultural institutes, and others. The agro-industrial companies segment held the largest share in 2017. This can be attributed to the high usage of this technology by these companies for crop cultivation. Remote fertigation monitoring service is used by these companies for a wide range of applications such as seeding, fertilizing and spraying operations across various farms worldwide.
The agricultural institutes segment is expected to grow at a lucrative rate over the forecast period owing to increasing government support towards research in new technologies related to agriculture.
Regional Analysis:
North America dominated the global market in 2017. The region is expected to maintain its position over the forecast period. North America has a well-established agriculture sector and high adoption of modern technologies in farming practices, which has led to an increased demand for remote fertigation monitoring services in this region. Moreover, increasing government initiatives and investments on R&D for developing advanced agricultural products are also contributing towards growth of the regional market.
Asia Pacific is expected to grow at fastest rate during the forecast period owing to increase in number of small-scale farmers across countries such as India.
Growth Factors:
- Increasing demand for food due to population growth
- Rising awareness about the benefits of remote fertigation monitoring service
- Technological advancements in remote fertigation monitoring service
- Growing demand for precision agriculture
- Increasing adoption of IoT-based solutions in agriculture
Scope Of The Report
Report Attributes
Report Details
Report Title
Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Research Report
By Type
Monitoring Services with Testing, Monitoring Services without Testing
By Application
Agro-Industrial Companies, Agricultural Institutes, Others
By Companies
SGS, Netafim, SMART Fertilizer Management, TIMAC AGRO International, Autogrow, Banyan Water
Regions Covered
North America, Europe, APAC, Latin America, MEA
Base Year
2021
Historical Year
2019 to 2020 (Data from 2010 can be provided as per availability)
Forecast Year
2030
Number of Pages
230
Number of Tables & Figures
161
Customization Available
Yes, the report can be customized as per your need.
Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Report Segments:
The global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service market is segmented on the basis of:
Types
Monitoring Services with Testing, Monitoring Services without Testing
The product segment provides information about the market share of each product and the respective CAGR during the forecast period. It lays out information about the product pricing parameters, trends, and profits that provides in-depth insights of the market. Furthermore, it discusses latest product developments & innovation in the market.
Applications
Agro-Industrial Companies, Agricultural Institutes, Others
The application segment fragments various applications of the product and provides information on the market share and growth rate of each application segment. It discusses the potential future applications of the products and driving and restraining factors of each application segment.
Some of the companies that are profiled in this report are:
- SGS
- Netafim
- SMART Fertilizer Management
- TIMAC AGRO International
- Autogrow
- Banyan Water
Highlights of The Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Report:
- The market structure and projections for the coming years.
- Drivers, restraints, opportunities, and current trends of market.
- Historical data and forecast.
- Estimations for the forecast period 2030.
- Developments and trends in the market.
- By Type:
- Monitoring Services with Testing
- Monitoring Services without Testing
- By Application:
- Agro-Industrial Companies
- Agricultural Institutes
- Others
- Market scenario by region, sub-region, and country.
- Market share of the market players, company profiles, product specifications, SWOT analysis, and competitive landscape.
- Analysis regarding upstream raw materials, downstream demand, and current market dynamics.
- Government Policies, Macro & Micro economic factors are also included in the report.
We have studied the Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market in 360 degrees via. both primary & secondary research methodologies. This helped us in building an understanding of the current market dynamics, supply-demand gap, pricing trends, product preferences, consumer patterns & so on. The findings were further validated through primary research with industry experts & opinion leaders across countries. The data is further compiled & validated through various market estimation & data validation methodologies. Further, we also have our in-house data forecasting model to predict market growth up to 2030.
Regional Analysis
- North America
- Europe
- Asia Pacific
- Middle East & Africa
- Latin America
Note: A country of choice can be added in the report at no extra cost. If more than one country needs to be added, the research quote will vary accordingly.
The geographical analysis part of the report provides information about the product sales in terms of volume and revenue in regions. It lays out potential opportunities for the new entrants, emerging players, and major players in the region. The regional analysis is done after considering the socio-economic factors and government regulations of the countries in the regions.
How you may use our products:
- Correctly Positioning New Products
- Market Entry Strategies
- Business Expansion Strategies
- Consumer Insights
- Understanding Competition Scenario
- Product & Brand Management
- Channel & Customer Management
- Identifying Appropriate Advertising Appeals
8 Reasons to Buy This Report
- Includes a Chapter on the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic On the Market
- Report Prepared After Conducting Interviews with Industry Experts & Top Designates of the Companies in the Market
- Implemented Robust Methodology to Prepare the Report
- Includes Graphs, Statistics, Flowcharts, and Infographics to Save Time
- Industry Growth Insights Provides 24/5 Assistance Regarding the Doubts in the Report
- Provides Information About the Top-winning Strategies Implemented by Industry Players.
- In-depth Insights On the Market Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Threats
- Customization of the Report Available
Frequently Asked Questions?
Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service is a service that allows you to remotely monitor your irrigation system. This service can help you troubleshoot and fix problems with your irrigation system, so that you can keep your plants healthy and thriving.
Some of the key players operating in the remote fertigation monitoring service market are SGS, Netafim, SMART Fertilizer Management, TIMAC AGRO International, Autogrow, Banyan Water.
Chapter 1 Executive Summary
Chapter 2 Assumptions and Acronyms Used
Chapter 3 Research Methodology
Chapter 4 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Overview
4.1 Introduction
4.1.1 Market Taxonomy
4.1.2 Market Definition
4.1.3 Macro-Economic Factors Impacting the Market Growth
4.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Dynamics
4.2.1 Market Drivers
4.2.2 Market Restraints
4.2.3 Market Opportunity
4.3 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market - Supply Chain Analysis
4.3.1 List of Key Suppliers
4.3.2 List of Key Distributors
4.3.3 List of Key Consumers
4.4 Key Forces Shaping the Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market
4.4.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.4.3 Threat of Substitution
4.4.4 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.5 Competitive Rivalry
4.5 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size & Forecast, 2018-2028
4.5.1 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size and Y-o-Y Growth
4.5.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Absolute $ Opportunity
Chapter 5 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Analysis and Forecast by Type
5.1 Introduction
5.1.1 Key Market Trends & Growth Opportunities by Type
5.1.2 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Type
5.1.3 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Type
5.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Type
5.2.1 Monitoring Services with Testing
5.2.2 Monitoring Services without Testing
5.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Type
Chapter 6 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Analysis and Forecast by Applications
6.1 Introduction
6.1.1 Key Market Trends & Growth Opportunities by Applications
6.1.2 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Applications
6.1.3 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Applications
6.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Applications
6.2.1 Agro-Industrial Companies
6.2.2 Agricultural Institutes
6.2.3 Others
6.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Applications
Chapter 7 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Analysis and Forecast by Region
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 Key Market Trends & Growth Opportunities by Region
7.1.2 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Region
7.1.3 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Region
7.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Region
7.2.1 North America
7.2.2 Europe
7.2.3 Asia Pacific
7.2.4 Latin America
7.2.5 Middle East & Africa (MEA)
7.3 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Region
Chapter 8 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Impact
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Current & Future Impact Analysis
8.3 Economic Impact Analysis
8.4 Government Policies
8.5 Investment Scenario
Chapter 9 North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Analysis and Forecast
9.1 Introduction
9.2 North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Country
9.2.1 U.S.
9.2.2 Canada
9.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
9.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
9.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
9.6 North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Type
9.6.1 Monitoring Services with Testing
9.6.2 Monitoring Services without Testing
9.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Type
9.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Type
9.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Type
9.10 North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Applications
9.10.1 Agro-Industrial Companies
9.10.2 Agricultural Institutes
9.10.3 Others
9.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Applications
9.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Applications
9.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Applications
Chapter 10 Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Analysis and Forecast
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Country
10.2.1 Germany
10.2.2 France
10.2.3 Italy
10.2.4 U.K.
10.2.5 Spain
10.2.6 Russia
10.2.7 Rest of Europe
10.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
10.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
10.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
10.6 Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Type
10.6.1 Monitoring Services with Testing
10.6.2 Monitoring Services without Testing
10.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Type
10.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Type
10.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Type
10.10 Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Applications
10.10.1 Agro-Industrial Companies
10.10.2 Agricultural Institutes
10.10.3 Others
10.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Applications
10.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Applications
10.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Applications
Chapter 11 Asia Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Analysis and Forecast
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Asia Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Country
11.2.1 China
11.2.2 Japan
11.2.3 South Korea
11.2.4 India
11.2.5 Australia
11.2.6 South East Asia (SEA)
11.2.7 Rest of Asia Pacific (APAC)
11.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
11.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
11.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
11.6 Asia Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Type
11.6.1 Monitoring Services with Testing
11.6.2 Monitoring Services without Testing
11.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Type
11.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Type
11.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Type
11.10 Asia Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Applications
11.10.1 Agro-Industrial Companies
11.10.2 Agricultural Institutes
11.10.3 Others
11.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Applications
11.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Applications
11.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Applications
Chapter 12 Latin America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Analysis and Forecast
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Latin America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Country
12.2.1 Brazil
12.2.2 Mexico
12.2.3 Rest of Latin America (LATAM)
12.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
12.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
12.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
12.6 Latin America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Type
12.6.1 Monitoring Services with Testing
12.6.2 Monitoring Services without Testing
12.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Type
12.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Type
12.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Type
12.10 Latin America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Applications
12.10.1 Agro-Industrial Companies
12.10.2 Agricultural Institutes
12.10.3 Others
12.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Applications
12.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Applications
12.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Applications
Chapter 13 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Analysis and Forecast
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Country
13.2.1 Saudi Arabia
13.2.2 South Africa
13.2.3 UAE
13.2.4 Rest of Middle East & Africa (MEA)
13.3 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Country
13.4 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Country
13.5 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Country
13.6 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Type
13.6.1 Monitoring Services with Testing
13.6.2 Monitoring Services without Testing
13.7 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Type
13.8 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Type
13.9 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Type
13.10 Middle East & Africa (MEA) Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast by Applications
13.10.1 Agro-Industrial Companies
13.10.2 Agricultural Institutes
13.10.3 Others
13.11 Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis by Applications
13.12 Absolute $ Opportunity Assessment by Applications
13.13 Market Attractiveness Analysis by Applications
Chapter 14 Competition Landscape
14.1 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market: Competitive Dashboard
14.2 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market: Market Share Analysis, 2019
14.3 Company Profiles (Details – Overview, Financials, Developments, Strategy)
14.3.1 SGS
14.3.2 Netafim
14.3.3 SMART Fertilizer Management
14.3.4 TIMAC AGRO International
14.3.5 Autogrow
14.3.6 Banyan Water
